Weird question, huh? Is it a lack of self-respect on both parties part when an act of such intimacy takes place during a maternal state when the guy isn't the father of the unborn? Not many ask this question and this is something that should be addressed. I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't take much brain power to figure out that this is Dead Wrong (My Opinion)! Okay, judge me, but I have seen porn with pregnant women and I can't believe that they needed the money that bad to even sleep with a man and let them ejaculate inside of them, feeding the fetus this unknown sperm. They are not the father! As much as we can fuss out women who does this, is it right to point fingers at the men who engages in it? I've heard guys say that sex is better with a pregnant woman. I'm like really dude, you are pathetic. Some men are very comfortable with having sex with a woman who isn't carrying their child; to that, I say…, definitely no moral conviction whatsoever. Okay, dislike me if I'm right or wrong, but it's a fact that women's hormones rage out of control when they are prenatal, but that doesn't constitute spreading your legs to a guy who isn't fathering the child for which you are being blessed with. I'm pretty sure those who read this will say…, "It is up to the persons who are involved." True, enough, but is it safe to say that taking part of this is morally wrong and downgrading? Do we not think about the child whom is in the womb? However, I am not speaking of those that were or are pregnant and didn't know that you were; you are excluded from this topic. Until next time…"I leave you with this."-Cynthia Corbett
No comments:
Post a Comment